![]() The resources available through HIIT Science will detail plenty of specific examples of how to develop athletes physically, from a wide range of well-respected professionals. However, some methods are inherently better they don’t take time away from the factors that are important to ensuring team-sport success. That’s not to say that we can’t gather important information about our players regularly. Because of these limitations, I really feel like we waste too much time “testing” and “monitoring” athletes time that could be better spent developing physical qualities, or technical and tactical abilities. The constraints are extensive, whether it be a small budget, an old-school coach who is unfamiliar with sport science, or a minimal level of player buy-in. We practitioners are faced with the challenge of sifting through all the latest methods and techniques, most of which are padded by questionable claims from manufacturers and stakeholders, in order to identify what can actually be beneficial to performance. That’s not to say that what we do as an industry isn’t significant, but it’s important to keep in mind where we fit within the context of everything that goes towards winning games. The teams with the best players typically win, regardless of which GPS provider the team decides to sign with or which pre-season testing protocol was used in the first week of training. However, as far as I know, there seems to be little to no correlation between the amount of money spent on technology and on-field performance. The sport science industry has come a long way from the days of manually coding matches using a pen and paper, and the recent influx of technologies such as global positioning systems (GPS) and accelerometers have allowed us to be far more objective with our decision-making processes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |